国产ADCP流速精度比测试验研究
作者:
作者单位:

中国船舶科学研究中心,江苏 无锡 214082

作者简介:

曹园山(1992-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事水下无人装备开发与应用研究。

中图分类号:

P716.1

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划“深海和极地关键技术与装备专项”(2023XFC2809105)


Experimental Study on Current Velocity Accuracy Comparison of Domestic ADCPs
Author:
Affiliation:

China Ship Scientific Research Center,Wuxi 214082 ,China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [18]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对低频 ADCP 的测速精度标检试验室条件无法满足的问题,参考国家及行业标准要求,在千岛湖采用同步比测方式进行了国产低频 ADCP 流速测量精度标检试验。通过试验区域的深度初探,结合试跑阶段的回波分析确定了比测过程的层数、层厚以及交替工作间隔时间等参数,在试验区域进行了多航速折返比测试验。试验结果显示:由于水体悬浮物少等因素,千岛湖水域的流层回波强度整体偏弱,相对而言 ADCP 近底流层测量会受到比较强的底回波干扰;利用未受干扰的流层数据对比,国产 DVLⅡ-300kHz 型 ADCP 与同频率进口 ADCP 的剖面流速测量精度相当。

    Abstract:

    In response to the problem that the conditions of the speed measurement accuracy calibration laboratory for low-frequency ADCP cannot be met,a domestic low-frequency ADCP current velocity measurement accuracy calibration test is conducted in Qiandao Lake using a synchronous comparison method,referring to national and industry standards. Based on preliminary study of the depth of experimental area and the analysis of echo during the trial run stage,parameters such as layer number,layer thickness,and alternating working interval during the comparison process are determined. Multiple-speed turn back comparison tests are conducted in experimental area. The experimental results show that due to factors such as low suspended solids in the water,the echo intensity of the current layer in the Qiandao Lake area is generally weak,and ADCP near bottom layer measurement is affected by strong bottom echo interference. By comparing undisturbed flow layer data,the velocity profile measurement accuracy of domestic DVL II-300 kHz ADCP is equivalent to that of imported ADCP at the same frequency.

    参考文献
    [1] PINKEL R.A personal history of Doppler sonar development at the Marine Physical Laboratory,SIO[J].Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,2016,140(4):3284-3285.
    [2] 徐琳.声学多普勒流速测量关键技术研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2016.
    [3] 于大磊.浅析ADCP在流量测验中的优缺点[J].黑龙江国土资源,2018(9):51-51.
    [4] 刘彦祥.ADCP 技术发展及其应用综述[J].海洋测绘,2016,36(2):45-49.
    [5] 陶乐文.ADCP 实验室校准系统[D].南京:东南大学,2017.
    [6] 乔正明,肖熹,吴姚振,等.ADCP 应用研究:声学多普勒流速剖面仪检定水槽拖车试验综述[J].海洋开发与管理,2017,34(12):81-84.
    [7] HUMMON J M,FIRING E.A direct comparison of two RDI shipboard ADCPs:a 75-kHz ocean surveyor and a 150-kHz narrow band[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2003,20(6):872-888.
    [8] HOLLIDAY N P,POLLARD R T,GRIFFITHS G.A comparison of simultaneous measurements from shipboard VM-150 and OS-75 acoustic Doppler current profilers[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/OES Seventh Working Conference on Current Measurement Technology.San Diego:IEEE,2003.
    [9] 邓锴,张兆伟,俞建林,等.声学多普勒流速剖面仪(ADCP)国内外进展[J].海洋信息,2019,34(4):8-11.
    [10] 周营英,王敏,何龙标,等.ADCP 压电换能器及其校准方法研究进展[J].压电与声光,2022,44(3):381
    [11] 莫喜平.我国水声换能器技术研究进展与发展机遇 [J].中国科学院院刊,2019,34(3):272-282.
    [12] 周凯,孙云鹏,赵士伟,等.声学多普勒流速剖面仪海上比测试验研究[J].海洋技术学报,2023,42(6):35-41.
    [13] 江帆,程绍华,庞永超.声学多普勒流速剖面仪关键测量性能海上比对试验及结果分析[J].海洋技术学报,2020,39(6):59-64.
    [14] 蒋建平,朱汉华.国产ADCP精度比测分析[J].人民黄河,2020,42(8):164-168.
    [15] 宋大雷,周相建,陈朝晖,等.海流计发展现状与发展趋势展望[J].船海工程,2017,46(1):93-100.
    [16] 周庆伟,白杨,封哲,等.海流测量技术发展及应用 [J].海洋测绘,2018,38(3):73-77.
    [17] 国家海洋局.HY/T 102—2007.声学多普勒流速剖面仪检测方法[S].北京:标准化出版社,2007.
    [18] 国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 24558—2009.声学多普勒流速剖面仪[S].北京:标准化出版社,2009.
    引证文献
引用本文

曹园山,成月,郑鹏,等.国产ADCP流速精度比测试验研究[J].数字海洋与水下攻防,2024,7(3):276-284

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-19
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-07-02
文章二维码